PRESIDENTIAL TREASON 102
(The Clinton Administration – 1999)
The delegation of power through Executive Order #12919 and Presidential Decision Directives #62 and #63
By: Gretchen Glass
Section 1. Introduction - Reviewing the President’s
‘accomplishments’ from Presidential Treason 101.
The
President successfully staffed his Administration with key figures of like mind
who have/had connections to Communist China and/or Russia to create the
permissive environment necessary to 1) accept illegal campaign contributions
from the Chinese military; 2) cover-up the ongoing Chinese espionage at the
National Labs, and 3) facilitate the transfer, legal or covert, of sensitive
satellite, defense, and computer technology to Communist China and Russia.
The
President has, indeed, earned an A+ in Presidential Treason 101. Now it’s time
to move on to the possibility of a national emergency, martial law, suspension
of the Constitution and an end to our form of Government . .
.
Section 2. Imagine the following long-term KGB game
plan developed and set in motion in
1.
Select a bright, personable young man from an out of the way place in America
who loathes the military, is protesting against America, has no moral or
ethical values and has an insatiable hunger for power - one who has his heart
set on becoming the President of the United States.
2.
Select the only target date, determined by computer experts that can be
predicted with certainly to be a time of turmoil in
3.
Set up the appropriate connections to provide the capital and influence to
propel him along the path to the White House.
4.
When the President is in place, continue to provide capital in return for the
1) transfer of secret technology to strengthen the Communist military and 2)
increased trade revenues and monetary ‘aid’ to strengthen the economic
structures of the Communist countries.
5.
The President will cut defense spending which will not only weaken the American
military and defense capabilities, but also create the illusion of a strong
economy that will, at the ‘correct’ time, have the stock market in the most
vulnerable position in decades.
6.
As the target date approaches, the President will put in place the necessary
combination of Executive Orders, Presidential Decision Directives and
additional key figures to ready the Administration for the declaration of a
national emergency and, if need be, martial law.
7.
Sometime during 1999, the President will put the finishing touches on the
‘mission plan’ with a diversion that will continue through the end of the year.
It must tie up the media and the Congress and, preferably, further exhaust the
military and defense, divide the country and act to support other phases of the
mission. A war will be the perfect solution. Select an area of continuous
unrest where the timing of such an engagement will be optional and will enable
the calling of reservists who will then be required to participate if martial
law is declared.
8.
By mid-1999 the stage will be set and the clock will be ticking on to the end
of the century, a national emergency and the end of our form of Government.
Section 3. Selecting key figures to implement the
plan.
1. National Security Advisor (a.k.a. The
Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and the #1 person at
the National Security Council (NSC)): Samuel ‘
2. Senior Director for Nonproliferation and
Export Controls at the National Security Council and Special Assistant to the
President: Gary Samore. Mr. Samore worked at the Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory from 1984-1987. From the New York Times 4/8/99: The Chinese
tested a neutron warhead in 1988 using "secret data stolen from the
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory." It appears that Mr. Samore, as a
senior National Security Council official, operated with Berger in facilitating
the cover-up of the Chinese espionage at the National Labs. According to the
New York Times 4/21/99: "After receiving more detailed evidence of Chinese
spying in the summer of 1997, the National Security Council sought a quick,
narrowly focused analysis from the CIA and used it to cast doubt on the
troubling conclusions reached by the Energy Department analysis, officials
said." "Samore overstated the degree to which the CIA 1997 analysis
cast doubt on the Energy Departments findings, according to an Administration
official." "At the time, Samore and Berger were deeply involved in
planning the agenda of a U.S.-Chinese summit meeting." The meeting was
used to "elevate the relations between the two nations".
3. Secretary of Commerce: William S. Daley.
Mr. Daley was
4. Inspector General of the Department of
Commerce: Johnnie E. Frazier. (Nominated 3/25/99) Mr. Frazier had been the
Assistant Inspector General at the Commerce Department where he supervised
complex reviews, including trade promotions and export licensing. Freely
translated, he supervised the export licensing when sensitive technology was
transferred to
5. Under Secretary of Commerce for
International Trade: Stuart E. Eizenstat. Mr. Eizenstat was Vice Chairman
at the
6. The Director of the Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Office (CIAO): Jeffrey A.
Hunker. (The CIAO is a planning arm of Clinton’s new bureaucracy mandated
by his Presidential Decision Directive #63 discussed in Section 9.) Prior to
joining the office, Dr. Hunker served as Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of
Commerce, where his responsibilities included issues relating to
7. Director of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA): James Lee Witt. Mr. Witt, a native of
8. The number two man at the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA): Raymond Lloyd "Buddy" Young. (WND
2/2/99) To quote his official bio from the .gov website: Mr. Young is a native
of
9. Secretary of Energy: Bill Richardson,
from
10.
Assistant Secretary for International
Affairs at the Energy Department: David L. Goldwyn (Nominated 4/7/99) Mr.
Goldwin was an associate with the international law firm of Paul, Weiss,
Rifkind, Wharton and Garrison, with offices in Communist China, where he was a
member of the international practice committee. He is the principal advisor to
the Secretary, Deputy Secretary and Under Secretary on all international policy
issues at the Energy Department.
11. Assistant Secretary for Non-Proliferation
and National Security at the Department of Energy: Rose Eilene Gottemoeller.
According to The Center for Security Policy on 4/26/99 regarding the years of
warnings about penetration of some of the
12.
Secretary of the Army: Louis Caldera.
Mr. Caldera was with the international law firm of O’Melveny & Myers that
has offices in Communist China.
13.
Deputy Secretary of State: Strobe
Talbott. Mr. Talbott was at
14.
Inspector General of the Department of
Justice (DOJ): Michael R. Bromwich who is/was a partner in the
15.
Associate Attorney General at the
Department of Justice: Raymond C. Fisher. Mr. Fisher is/was a partner in
the international law firm of Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe with offices in
16.
Chairman of the Intelligence Oversight
Board (IOB): Anthony S. Harrington. Mr. Harrington is a senior partner of
the international law firm of Hogan and Hartson (with Berger) and, as a senior
partner, receives benefits, either directly or indirectly, from dealings with
17.
Chairman of the President’s Foreign
Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB): Warren B. Rudman. Mr. Rudman is a
partner in the international law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
with offices in Communist China and who, as a partner, receives benefits,
either directly or indirectly, from dealings with Communist China.
Section 4. Review the existing US Code
1. Implementing a National Emergency: US
Code Title 50, Chapter 34, Subchapter II, Sec. 1621. Declaration of national
emergency by President. (a) "With respect to Acts of Congress authorizing
the exercise, during the period of a national emergency, of any special or
extraordinary power, the President is authorized to declare such national
emergency. Such proclamation shall immediately be transmitted to the Congress
and published in the Federal Register."
US Code Title 50, Chapter 34, Subchapter III, Sec. 1631. Declaration of
national emergency by Executive order. "When the President declares a
national emergency, no powers or authorities made available by statute for use
in the event of an emergency shall be exercised unless and until the President
specifies the provisions of law under which he proposes that he, or other
officers will act."
2. Terminating a National Emergency:
3. Martial law: Title 32, Chapter V, Part
501,Sec. 501.4. "Martial Law depends for its justification upon public
necessity. Necessity gives rise to its creation; necessity justifies its
exercise; and necessity limits its duration." "In most instances the
decision to impose martial law is made by the President, who normally announces
his decision by proclamation, which usually contains his instructions
concerning its exercise and any limitations thereon." When the Federal
Armed Forces have been committed, "the population of the affected area
will be informed of the rules of conduct and other restrictive measures the military
is authorized to enforce. These will normally be announced by proclamation or
order…" "Federal Armed Forces ordinarily will exercise police
powers…"
Sec
501.1 (e) "Units and members of the Army Reserve on active duty may be
employed in civil disturbances operations in the same manner as active
forces."
Sec.
501.3 (a) "In the enforcement of the laws, Federal Armed Forces are
employed as a part of the military power of the United States and act under the
orders of the President as Commander in Chief."
Note:
Taking the subject of martial law from the realm of absurdity to that of a very
real possibility: Senator Robert Bennett, Chairman of the Special Senate
Committee on the Year 2000 Technology Problem asked Deputy Defense Secretary,
John Hamre: "In the event of a Y2K-induced breakdown of community services
that might call for martial law," will the military be ready? Hamre’s
reply: "We’ve got fundamental issues to deal with that go beyond just the
Year 2000 contingency planning. And I think you’re right to bring that
up." WND 6/18/98
Section 5. Evaluate and determine current situation
and what must be changed.
1. Implementing a National Emergency: No
problem - it is guaranteed that there will be at least minor disruptions and
since the President determines the ‘need’, a national emergency can be
declared. All the necessary Executive Orders and Presidential Decision
Directives must be in place, with tight control established and maintained by
‘loyal’ participants. (See Section 3.)
2. Terminating a National Emergency: Since
the Congress can enact into law a joint resolution to terminate a national
emergency, the emergency must be declared while Congress is on recess or on
Christmas break. Measures must be taken to prevent Congress from voting on such
a joint resolution by taking control of communication and/or transportation
systems.
3. Martial law: The disruptions guaranteed
at the turn of the century will justify the declaration of martial law. Tight
control must be established and maintained by ‘loyal’ participants. The Army
Reserve must be put on active duty prior to the declaration to guarantee their
participation. (Just recently the calling up of reserves began.)
Section 6. Clarification of facts relating to
Sections 7, 8 and 9. Note: The
reader should keep in mind the following facts when reviewing Executive Order
#12919 and Presidential Decision Directives #62 and #63:
1)
Sandy Berger is the number one person at the National Security Council, he is
the National Security Advisor and he is the Assistant to the President for
National Security Affairs. These names are interchangeable - the reader should
not be confused by the smokescreen created in these documents.
2)
Gary Samore, occupying a high post at the National Security Council,
coordinated with Berger (a) the facilitation of the espionage cover-up, (b) the
transfer of sensitive technology to Communist countries and (c) the promotion
of U.S.-Chinese ‘relations’.
3)
This is critical: Care must be taken when reading the text of the following documents.
Remember, Berger ‘sat on’ the espionage for a year before reporting it to the
President. When you read that everyone ‘reports to the President through the
National Security Advisor’ - think what that means. Since the President is to
give the orders, if Berger decides not to pass the information ‘through’ to the
President as he did with the espionage, then Berger will, in the President’s
name, be giving the orders - that is an assignment of authority of the first
order! Therefore, it is a fact that Sandy Berger has total control over all
situations and information. Similarly, when various department heads act as his
advisor, Mr. Berger is at the top making the decisions. While the National
Security Council provides the guidelines, Mr. Berger gives the approval to FEMA
and other participating agencies - that is, the ‘interpretation’ of those
guidelines is up to Berger. Although power appears to be assigned to the
National Security Council, Mr. Berger has the last word. Mr. Berger, as the
last filter, has absolute power and control!
Section 7. Executive Order #12919 - NATIONAL DEFENSE
INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES PREPAREDNESS - June 6, 1994 - (US Code Title 50 Appendix -
War and National Defense, Title VII, Sec. 2153) (This Executive Order revokes 9 previous EOs,
revises 4 others and significantly changes Title 50 of the US Code.)
In times of national emergency, it
delegates authority to the National Security Advisor to use Federal departments
and agencies to take total control of our lives, our property and our
government, with Congress receiving only ‘after the fact’ reports.
Enormous Federal Bureaucracy with
Extreme and Absolute Power at the Top:
The plan is for total control established through the use of Federal departments
and agencies. For example: 1) The following is repeated numerous times in
delegating authority to various Federal departments and agencies: The authority
of the President "to require acceptance and priority performance of
contracts or orders (other than contracts of employment) to promote the
national defense over performance of any other contracts or orders, and to
allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate
to promote the national defense" 2) Federal departments and agencies
"in the event of a potential threat to the security of the United States
to take actions necessary to ensure the availability of adequate
industrial resources and production capability, including services and critical
technology for national defense requirements." 3) "responsible for
defense acquisition (or for industrial resources needed to support defense
acquisition)". 4) "control and coordination of civil transportation
capacity regardless of ownership" 5) "control the general distribution
of any material (including applicable services) in the civilian market" 6)
"control, and distribution (including pipelines) of all of these forms of
energy." 7) "usable water, from all sources, within the jurisdiction
of the United States, which can be managed, controlled, and allocated to meet
emergency requirements."
It
appears that every known non-elected Federal ‘official’ has an assigned duty
under this order. Here is a list of those involved, in the order of appearance
in the document: The National Security Advisor, Director of Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA), Secretary of Agriculture, Secretary of Energy,
Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Transportation, Secretary
of Commerce, Secretary of Defense, President and Chairman of the Export-Import
Bank of the United States, Secretary of the Treasury, Director of the Office of
Management and Budget, each Federal Reserve Bank, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, Secretary of State, The United States Trade Representative,
the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, the Director of Central Intelligence,
"and the heads of other departments and agencies as required",
Administration of General Services, Director of Selective Service "and
such other persons as the director of FEMA shall designate", National
Labor Relations Board, Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, Attorney
General, Secretary of each military department and "heads of other
appropriate Federal departments and agencies", Bureau of the Census. Plus,
a National Defense Executive Reserve (NDER) is established with units in other
departments or agencies and a huge coordination effort is to get underway. Then
each of the aforementioned Federal departments or agencies can hire
consultants.
This
Executive Order is the most convoluted piece of work imaginable - and could
never be implemented in the case of a national emergency, or any other time.
On the surface it appears to make sense but the coordination of the various
Federal departments and agencies would be impossible. It would require a fully
functional coordinated network to be in place before the emergency
occurs. It does not take a genius to figure out that an attempt to implement
this order, in its current form, would create unimaginable chaos. (If you get
nothing more from this writing, it is that you should not be financially
exposed near the end of 1999.) So, if the order, as it stands, can’t be
implemented, what is the purpose of its existence? Let’s take a look at the
assignment of authority under this order and see who is at the top of the food
chain.
Enter Sandy Berger - remember Mr. Berger is the number one person at
the National Security Council, he is the National Security Advisor and he is
the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs. 1) "The
head of every Federal department and agency assigned functions under this order
shall ensure that the performance of these functions is consistent with National
Security Council policy and guidelines" (HOWEVER) 2) The Director
of FEMA will "provide guidance and procedures approved by the Assistant
to the President for National Security Affairs to the Federal
departments and agencies under this order." 3) "The National
Security Council is the principal forum for consideration and resolution
of national security resource preparedness policy." (HOWEVER) 4) "if
not resolved, such issues will be referred to the Assistant to the President for
National Security Affairs for final determination" 5) The
Director of FEMA shall "serve as an advisor to the National
Security Council on issues of national security resource preparedness
and on the use of the authorities and functions delegated by this order."
6) "The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs is
hereby delegated the authority under subsection 101(c)(3) of the Act, and will
be assisted by the Director, FEMA, in ensuring the coordinated administration
of the Act." 7) "The National defense Executive Reserve (NDER) shall
notify, in writing, the Assistant to the President for National
Security Affairs". Is there any question who is in charge?
While
the Director of FEMA appears to be given far-reaching authority, the final
determination of policy always goes back to "the Assistant to the
President for National Security Affairs" - in effect, the Director of FEMA
‘assists’ the National Security Advisor.
Although
the laws appear to have been ‘reworked’ to assign more power and control to the
Secretary of Commerce, he too must report to the National Security Advisor:
"The Secretary of Commerce shall administer the Defense Priorities and
Allocations System ("DPAS") regulations"; "The Secretary of
Commerce will redelegate to the Secretary of Defense, and the heads of other
departments and agencies as appropriate" "The Secretary of Commerce
shall act as appropriate upon Special Priorities Assistance requests in a time
frame consistent with the urgency of the need at hand." "the
Secretary of Commerce, who shall redelegate to the Secretary of Energy";
"The Secretary of Commerce shall make the finding". It appears that
the Secretary of Commerce is near the top of the food chain.
Is there a way out of this? Although it would take a lawyer with the parsing
talents of the President to determine a legal ‘finding’, we ask you to review
the following:
Sec.
301. "General authorization to delegate functions; publication of
delegations.
The
President of the United States is authorized to designate and empower the head
of any department or agency in the executive branch, or any official thereof
who is required to be appointed by and with the advice and consent of the
Senate, to perform without approval, ratification, or other action by the
President (1) any function which is vested in the President by law, or (2) any
function which such officer is required or authorized by law to perform only
with or subject to the approval, ratification, or other action of the
President: Provided, That nothing contained herein shall relieve the President
of his responsibility in office for the acts of any such head or other official
designated by him to perform such functions. Such designation and authorization
shall be in writing, shall be published in the Federal Register, shall be
subject to such terms, conditions, and limitations as the President may deem
advisable, and shall be revocable at any time by the President in whole or in
part."
This
is the law, clearly cited in EO #12919, that gave the President the power to
assign duties under this order. However, since Sandy Berger has been delegated
the ultimate function in this order and Sandy Berger has never been
confirmed by the Senate, there appears to be a problem with the legality of
this Executive Order! This could also bring into question the delegation of authority
of Berger over the functions outlined in PDD #62 and #63. (Source: The Senate
Armed Services Committee who confirm appointees/nominees said Berger has never
been confirmed by the Senate and that "no advisors to the president are
confirmed." The Senate Library search showed that Berger has never been
confirmed. Similarly, a gentleman who deals with such matters for one of the
leading Senators said that Berger had never been confirmed. In addition, the
Parliamentarian’s Office of the U.S. Senate assured us, regarding
‘confirmation’ and ‘advice and consent of the Senate’ that "they are used
interchangeably".)
Where was our Congress when this
destructive, and probably illegal, Executive Order 'floated’ into our
Section 8. Presidential Decision Directive #62 -
Combating Terrorism. May 22, 1998.
This PDD is classified, with only a brief summary available. "This Directive
creates a new and more systematic approach to fighting the terrorist threat of
the next century." Of importance: "PDD-62 establishes the office of
the National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection and
Counter-Terrorism." The National Coordinator oversees the key agencies and
offices established in Presidential Decision Directive 63 (Section 9).
"The National Coordinator will work within the National Security Council,
report to the President through the Assistant to the President for National
Security Affairs". This is critical - Mr. Berger is again at the
top of the food chain - in charge of everything involving PDD #62 and PDD #63!
Section 9. Presidential Decision Directive #63 -
Protecting
Valid Concerns: PDD #63 addresses the issues of "physical and cyber-based systems
essential to the minimum operations of the economy and government. They
include, but are not limited to, telecommunications, energy, banking and
finance, transportation, water systems and emergency services, both
governmental and private." The emphasis in this Directive is on
cyber-based systems, specifically computer systems.
New Government Bureaucracy
with enormous power: PDD 63 sets up a new bureaucratic structure, with each
component reporting to the National Coordinator established in PDD-62 who
reports to the National Security Advisor. The most powerful part of this
structure is the "National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC) at the
FBI which will fuse representatives from the FBI,
Intrusive and Regulatory: This PDD authorizes control to be taken of
communications, including the internet, with interception of information and
monitoring, as implied by the following quotes: 1) The Information Sharing and
Analysis Center (ISAC) "could serve as the mechanism for gathering,
analyzing, appropriately sanitizing and disseminating private sector
information to both industry and the NIPC." 2) "the
And again, enter Mr. Berger: (Please review Section 6 for interpretation of this
paragraph.)
1) "The National Coordinator for Security,
Infrastructure Protection and Counter-terrorism shall be responsible for
coordinating the implementation of this directive. The National Coordinator
will report to the President through the Assistant to the President for National
Security Affairs." 2) The National Coordinator "shall provide
an annual report on the implementation of this directive to the President and
the heads of departments and agencies, through the Assistant to the President for
National Security Affairs." 3) In order to engage the private
sector fully, "The National Coordinator will be appointed by and report to
the President through the Assistant to the President for National
Security Affairs, who shall assure appropriate coordination with the
Assistant to the President for Economic Affairs." 4) "The National
Security Advisor shall appoint a Senior Director for Infrastructure
Protection on the NSC staff." 5) The President on 1/22/99 stated that he
and Berger have been working on this plan "for the better part of 6
years".
National Emergency and/or Martial Law? When the inevitable Y2K computer disruptions occur,
it will be impossible to distinguish them from terrorist attacks on our
‘cyber-based’ systems, which will automatically activate all the enforcement
arms involved in this PDD. The details are: 1) "The full authorities,
capabilities and resources of the government, including law enforcement,
regulation, foreign intelligence and defense preparedness shall be available,
as appropriate, to ensure that critical infrastructure protection is achieved
and maintained." 2) President 1/22/99: "It is helping us to ready
armed forces and National Guard units in every region to meet this
challenge."3) The National Plan Coordination (NPC) has now moved from the
Defense Department to the ‘infamous’ Commerce Department 4) the President has
authorized the FBI to expand its current organization to a full scale National
Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC) which includes "the FBI, U.S.
Secret Service, and other investigators experienced in computer crimes and
infrastructure protection, as well as a representative detailed from the
Department of Defense, the Intelligence Community and Lead Agencies (law
enforcement and internal security)." "to provide warnings of
cyber-threats and attacks, and the capability to respond to such
incidents." 5) "No later than the year 2000, the
Conclusion:
PDDs 62 and 63 draw into the scenario those enforcement agencies not mentioned
in EO #12919. The lead agencies now under the direction of Sandy Berger,
National Security Advisor, for purpose of this PDD are Commerce, Secret
Service, Treasury, EPA, Transportation, Justice/FBI (emergency law enforcement
services), FEMA, HHS, Energy, Lead Agencies for Justice/FBI (Law enforcement
and internal security), CIA (foreign intelligence) and National Defense.
Section 10. The Real Story. PDD-63 is the enforcement arm of Executive Order
#12919. The orchestration of Executive Order 12919 and Presidential Decision
Directives #62 and #63 is left to National Security Advisor, Sandy
Berger. Through the three instruments outlined above, the President has
assigned total control of every body of our government to his obedient National
Security Advisor. These three instruments mandate complete control of our life
and our freedom using every enforcement means available (FBI, Secret Service,
Armed Forces and Reserves, CIA, etc.) - all under the dictatorship of the
President and his National Security Advisor. While Mr. Berger’s ‘titles’ are
mentioned numerous times throughout these documents, our elected officials were
conspicuous by their absence. We ask you again to review Mr. Berger’s
‘qualifications’ as outlined in Section 3.
Section 11. As
Is it a coincidence that the two 'appointees', who have authority over
the dissemination of information to the President regarding National Security,
Berger and Harrington, are both partners in the same international law firm
that has dealings with
Is it a coincidence that the Inspector General of the DOJ Michael R.
Bromwich and the Secretary of Commerce William S. Daley were both partners in
the international law firm of Mayer, Brown & Platt, working out of the
firm's
Is it a coincidence that the Assistant Secretary for International
Affairs at the Energy Department, David L. Goldwyn and the Chairman of the
President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB), Warren B. Rudman,
were/are both with the international law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton
& Garrison with offices in Communist China?
Is it a coincidence, that
the top two positions at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) who
play a key role in national emergencies and martial law are held by Clinton’s
cronies who participated in the then-Governor Clinton’s highly questionable
Administration in Arkansas?
Is it a coincidence that, even using the highly edited White House
biographies, it is clear that nearly all of the key people in this grand
scenario, who would be integrally engaged in a national emergency or martial
law, fall into one or more of the following categories:
1) Have previous, or
current, ties to Communist China and/or
2) Were, or are, involved in
the transfer of sensitive technology and/or its cover-up,
3) Work, or have worked, for
international law firms with offices in Communist China and/or
4) Were tied to the National
Laboratories where the espionage took place?
And, is it a coincidence that, after meticulously flowcharting through the
smokescreen of diversions and deception in Executive Order #12919 and
Presidential Decision Directives #62 and #63, that Sandy Berger, a man of, at
best, questionable allegiances, emerged in charge of it all?
This summary of events does
not begin to scratch the surface, as we only have access to limited White
House-edited bios on the individuals mentioned here. A full investigation of
the entire Administration should prove enlightening . . .
The evidence appears to
suggest that Clinton has loaded the key positions in his Administration with
individuals who are either his old time cronies of like mind and/or individuals
who have a keen interest in promoting Clinton’s grand plan, or simply
incompetents who would represent no barrier to any of his plans.
The information in this
summary was obtained from official websites:.gov, AOL yellow pages, and
webpages of the law firms mentioned herein, with limited use of the regular AOL
search of highly reliable sources. (All quotes with no source given are from
official .gov websites.) While the information included herein is certainly
believed to be factual, the readers are left to ponder the evidence and
implications and to draw their own conclusions. While we do not state that any
of the above mentioned persons are consciously involved in any illegal
activity, the facts are certainly curious.
This summary, of a possible
preplanned scenario and the ‘enabling environment’ that has been created, is an
attempt to bring to light the ease with which a corrupt President could destroy
our fragile Republic. Hopefully, Congress will exercise every option to stop
the damage.
Add this information to
‘Presidential Treason 101’, the Cox Report, the Thompson Report, the Judicial
Watch investigations, the cover-up of espionage, and other treasonous
'accomplishments' of this Administration and the question must be asked:
Is this all a coincidence,
Or a carefully crafted plan to change our form of
Government?
Footnote: While many people
have reported their concerns regarding Y2K, EO#12919, PDD #63, a national
emergency, martial law and the suspension of the Constitution, we have not read
an accounting of ‘to whom’ the power will be assigned. Who will be in control
of this country? Not an elected official, not even a person confirmed by the
Senate, but the choice made solely by a corrupt and traitorous President - a
man the President worked with in politics in 1972, shortly after returning from
Moscow. We ask you to review, one more time, Mr. Berger’s ‘accomplishments’ in
Section 3 and ask yourself if you want this man to be in charge of your life
and freedom, and our Country. There is so much research to be done, and so
little time to warn the American people…
Time is running out! It’s up to all concerned
citizens to go after their elected representatives and to demand a review of
Clinton’s Executive Orders and Presidential Decision Directives and to put a
stop to this insanity!
This summary was prepared
by: Gretchen Glass, May, 1999
Gretchen Glass is a
mathematician, systems analyst, computer programmer, and a mother and
grandmother, who loves our Country. She believes that our fragile Republic is
in serious trouble and that the treasonous activities of the Clinton
Administration must be exposed and stopped. Gretchen recently visited the
‘Conservative Ring’ where she was "overwhelmed by the great talent and
good people involved in this mission". She firmly believes that if all
these people can work together, the message will be heard. Her contribution is
to present undisputed facts and to connect the dots to provide the ‘American
People’ with something they cannot easily dismiss. Her effort continues…